UX Audit & Lifecycle Experience Design
Reducing early adoption risk by identifying UX friction and redesigning the full patient lifecycle experience, from first touch through confident device use.
The brief came in as a content and communications problem. The diagnosis revealed something structurally different.
"Improve the onboarding communications program — patients aren't engaging with the content we're sending them during device activation."
This isn't a content engagement problem — it's a sequencing alignment failure. The communication architecture was built around a content calendar, not a patient readiness model. Patients were receiving advanced CGM management content before they'd established basic device confidence. The content was correct. The timing was wrong. The fix isn't better content — it's a lifecycle UX model built around behavioral readiness stages.
This reframe drove the entire service blueprint approach — moving from a calendar-driven CRM model to a readiness-staged behavioral sequencing system across 10 phases and 88 days.
Connected health device onboarding & wellness app retention. Identifying readiness-stage transition points and designing proactively around predicted drop-off moments applies to any connected health or wellness platform managing a critical first-use period — CGM, insulin pumps, remote monitoring, mental health apps, and fitness platforms all face the same lifecycle UX challenge.
Drop-off clustered at two specific transitions, not randomly distributed. Drop-off spiked at week 1 post-activation (device confidence gap) and weeks 4–5 (lifestyle integration demand before habit was established). The calendar crossed both transitions without acknowledging them.
I treated this as a lifecycle alignment problem, not a content problem — mapping the behavioral and emotional arc across the first-use period and redesigning sequence, prioritization, and timing around it: device confidence first, lifestyle integration mid-arc, habit reinforcement late. Ten phases across 88 days, each with a defined behavioral objective.
This patient readiness vs. content timing analysis was the foundational audit deliverable — it identified the sequential gap that produced the 20% drop-off. Five patient readiness stages mapped against actual CRM content delivery timing, with a 12-point friction inventory across sequencing, content architecture, CTA logic, and support visibility.
This deliverable reframed the project scope — moving the client from 'improve content' to 'rebuild the sequence,' unlocking a full service blueprint engagement rather than a copy refresh.
Fourteen email frames spanning the 88-day lifecycle arc, including A/B subject line variants and paired desktop/mobile layouts. Mid-fidelity delivery designed for MLR review alignment and development handoff, covering the complete programme sequence from device activation through graduation with consistent type styles, color tokens, and component states.
Delivered directly into MLR submission, eliminating a second design pass and compressing the Health Canada review timeline.
Service blueprint — UX lifecycle architecture. The FreeStyle Libre CRM onboarding service blueprint defined the full patient lifecycle UX arc — establishing the phase structure, behavioral sequencing, and experience design logic across an 88-day engagement program.
Became the exec-ready brief that held the room without a UX translator — clinical, regulatory, and brand stakeholders could read and act from it directly.
Lifecycle communication experience design — translated the service blueprint into a complete experience design architecture spanning the full onboarding arc. Early communications established device confidence; mid-arc introduced lifestyle integration; later-stage shifted toward habit reinforcement and long-term self-management behaviors.
Translated the service blueprint into an actionable delivery sequence the CRM team could execute without UX present in every sprint.
The 10-phase behavioral model held up as the right architecture. The gap was downstream: no feedback loop let the phase sequence branch on actual engagement signals — patients showing device confidence early should have advanced faster, patients showing inactivity should have hit a different intervention path before Phase 4. The data existed. The CRM wasn't built to act on it. I'd also bring HCP-side journey design in earlier — the intersection between patient onboarding and prescriber communication is where the sharpest alignment gains are.